received retransmit of request with ID 1994187572, retransmitting response anyway, i can' t even get the vpn past phase1. establishing connection 'ikev1-psk-xauth' failed, initiating Aggressive Mode IKE_SA ikev1-psk-xauth[1] to 193.174.193.64 IKE_SA ikev1-psk-xauth[1] established between 10.48.130.136[10.48.130.136]193.174.193.64[193.174.193.64] We discussed this on serverfault.com already. at the end) - didn't helped. i was just trying to follow your directions in the original post. <pre><code class="text"> Blocks sending packet: from 10.48.X.X[500] to 193.174.X.X[500] (236 bytes) If you install ike-scan and run it against your Meraki "server" sudo ipsec stop; sudo service xl2tpd stop; sudo ike-scan YOUR.SERVER.IP you can see what the default protocol is. The primary application of this feature in IKEv2 is the ability to perform one or more post-quantum key exchanges in conjunction with the classical (Elliptic Curve) Diffie-Hellman (EC . Share Improve this answer Follow answered Nov 13, 2019 at 11:32 PieroBelgetti 1 Add a comment Your Answer Post Your Answer QGIS Atlas print composer - Several raster in the same layout. conn ikev1-psk-xauth In your case it might be related to this: # leftauth2 = xauth If you only propose PSK authentication and not PSK+XAuth the server is probably not happy about it. modeconfig = pull generating ID_PROT request 0 [ ID HASH N(INITIAL_CONTACT) ] Be aware that these are all very weak algorithms. Why do we use perturbative series if they don't converge? 2) Look for this line:Transforms = TGBQM-ESP-AES256-SHA2_256-PFSGRP2-TUN-XF and replace it with Transforms = TGBQM-ESP-AES256-SHA2_256-PFSECP256-TUN-XF. Thank you for you help. sending packet: from 10.48.130.136[4500] to 193.174.193.64[4500] (60 bytes) This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. rightprotoport=17/1701 no XAuth method found I spoke to a Meraki tech and he said that it looks like it is not authenticating but didn't give me much more detail: I have gotten most of my instructions from this site: https://www.elastichosts.com/blog/linux-l2tpipsec-vpn-client/. To request a virtual IP from the server (mode config) you also want to set leftsourceip = %config. The logs on the Responder SonicWall will clearly display the exact problem, ensure that the Proposals are identical on both the VPN policies. sending packet: from 10.48.130.136[500] to 193.174.193.64[500] (236 bytes) So you want to set leftauth2 to xauth. received FRAGMENTATION vendor ID Next-generation firewall for SMB, Enterprise, and Government, Comprehensive security for your network security solution, Modern Security Management for todays security landscape, Advanced Threat Protection for modern threat landscape, High-speed network switching for business connectivity, Protect against todays advanced email threats, Next-generation firewall capabilities in the cloud, Stop advanced threats and rollback the damage caused by malware, Control access to unwanted and unsecure web content, SSLVPN Timeout not working - NetBios keeps session open, Configuring a Virtual Access Point (VAP) Profile for Internal Wireless Corporate Users, How to hide SSID of Access Points Managed by firewall. ike = 3des-md5-modp1024! Transforms = TGBQM-ESP-AES256-SHA2_256-PFSECP256-TUN-XF, Transforms = TGBQM-ESP-AES256-SHA2_256-PFSGRP14-TUN-XF, Sophos Firewall requires membership for participation - click to join. The stopping of the other services was required due to port conflicts if they were running during the scan. Is it appropriate to ignore emails from a student asking obvious questions? Any disadvantages of saddle valve for appliance water line? Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. E: Unable to locate package strongswan-plugin-xauth-generic, config setup received packet: from 193.174.X.X[4500] to 10.48.X.X[4500] (68 bytes) received packet: from 193.174.X.X[4500] to 10.48.X.X[4500] (60 bytes) Logs on Initiator Resolution The logs on the Responder SonicWall will clearly display the exact problem, ensure that the Proposals are identical on both the VPN policies. In the case of the Meraki at the time the answer was posted it only supported a single insecure protocol. received retransmit of request with ID 1994187572, retransmitting response By continuing to browse this site, you acknowledge the use of cookies. fragmentation=yes $ sudo ipsec up ikev1-psk-xauth maybe I could try to get some more info from working vpnc connection from log or something; also when I'm not using aggressive mode it fails, but with different error one line is this: "invalid HASH_V1 payload length, decryption failed?". stopbits 1. line aux 0. stopbits 1. line vty 0 4! esp = 3des-md5! received packet: from 193.174.193.64[500] to 10.48.130.136[500] (296 bytes) sending packet: from 10.48.130.136[500] to 193.174.193.64[500] (176 bytes) parsed ID_PROT response 0 [ ID HASH V ] </code></pre> So I guess your config is not correct. You can unsubscribe at any time from the Preference Center. Are there any suggestions on how to troubleshoot the cause for this? rightauth2 = xauth By clicking Post Your Answer, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy. generating ID_PROT request 0 [ KE No NAT-D NAT-D ] generating TRANSACTION response 3615668993 [ HASH CP ] ). sending packet: from 10.48.130.136[4500] to 193.174.193.64[4500] (92 bytes) Delay: days You should ideally use the most secure protocol your server supports. Received an un-encrypted NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN notify message, dropping - Cisco Community Start a conversation Cisco Community Technology and Support Security VPN Received an un-encrypted NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN notify message, dropping 23264 0 2 Received an un-encrypted NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN notify message, dropping csavgroup Beginner Options If you receive a NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN notify it means the peers is not happy about any of the algorithms or authentication methods. initiating Main Mode IKE_SA ikev1-psk-xauth[1] to 193.174.193.64 ikev1-psk-xauth: child: dynamic === dynamic TUNNEL 2. establishing connection 'ikev1-psk-xauth' failed esp = 3des-md5! I had an IPsec VPN set up from my 32-bit pfSense laptop at home to a Cisco IOS router at work. 10.48.130.136 %any : PSK "Password_of_my_Wifi" generating ID_PROT request 0 [ ID HASH N(INITIAL_CONTACT) ] parsed TRANSACTION request 3615668993 [ HASH CPRQ(X_TYPE X_USER X_PWD) ] OK. Why is it you are trying to change to PFCGRP2? My final configs are as follows Phase1. By clicking Post Your Answer, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy. What is the version of SFOS you are using? I used this blog post. leftprotoport=17/1701 *calculated HASH does not match HASH payload* received packet: from 193.174.X.X[4500] to 10.48.X.X[4500] (68 bytes) keylife=20m sending packet: from 10.48.X.X[4500] to 193.174.X.X[4500] (60 bytes) no ip http secure-server! received packet: from 193.174.193.64[4500] to 10.48.130.136[4500] (60 bytes) conn ikev1-psk-xauth leftsourceip=%config keyexchange=ikev1 The ESP proposal in the strongSwan config must match that of the Cisco box, so change it to esp=3des-md5!, or, alternatively, modify the Cisco config to use SHA-1 as integrity algorithm. Everything seemed to be working fine, even after upgrading to 2.2. This is kind of classical question and I'have found lot of discussions on this topic and tried many config tweaking, but nothing helped me so far. all I get is this no-proposal chosen error. I recently decided it would be better to switch that connection to another device at work that has a faster internet connection, which is a Cisco ASA5512 . NO-PROPOSAL-CHOSEN (14) what could be the prossible reason for IPSEC tunnel failure. One of the peers defined as Dynamic IP Gateway and installed with R77 . 10.48.X.X parsed INFORMATIONAL_V1 request 0 [ N(NO_PROP) ] How do we know the true value of a parameter, in order to check estimator properties? rightauth = psk Site design / logo 2022 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under CC BY-SA. When I run it by commenting aggressive mode. - 156812 This website uses cookies essential to its operation, for analytics, and for personalized content. i am having the same issue however i can not seem to be able to edit the .tgb file. received Cisco Unity vendor ID uptime: 10 minutes, since Mar 14 21:38:32 2019 received unknown vendor ID: fb:ee:13:63:2b:d4:bb:25:f5:57:77:e3:08:52:bd:64 maximum IKE_SA lifetime 28742s Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. I am trying to configure my client on rasppyberry pi for a remote VPN server(Shrew) provided with the following information. Listening IP addresses: received XAuth vendor ID modeconfig = pull No admin here. Add a new light switch in line with another switch? IPsec tunnel blocks after a while without error. parsed TRANSACTION request 2217701343 [ HASH CPRQ(X_TYPE X_USER X_PWD) ] sending packet: from 10.48.X.X[4500] to 193.174.X.X[4500] (60 bytes) I did have to put it into aggresive mode, specify ikev1 and set the ike algorithms. Connections: received unknown vendor ID: 1f:07:f7:0e:aa:65:14:d3:b0:fa:96:54:2a:50:01:00 I'm asking the remote team to send me any error logs they may have to see if their router sees something more useful than this message. received packet: from 193.174.193.64[4500] to 10.48.130.136[4500] (60 bytes) end. received FRAGMENTATION vendor ID no XAuth method found My work as a freelance was used in a scientific paper, should I be included as an author? The pdf document does mention the error but says: refer to admin. i' ve checked and rechecked the se. If the first PSK is correct you should get past that step. I am trying to configure my client using VPN (strongswan) to access the remote server whose DNS isvpngw.fh-kempten.de, My ipsec configuration file looks like the following (Recommend me any changes if needed?). For the sake of this exercise, we will not consider the default proposal, but please keep in mind it is inserted in the proposal during real-life troubleshooting. But I'm getting this error now and I am at a total loss. Please make sure the remote box is using the same or compatible proposal with your local Fortigate. fg60wifi and fg400, both on their version of 3.0 mr1. Thanks. Any experience with this? parsed ID_PROT response 0 [ KE No V V V V NAT-D NAT-D ] The last error indicates an incorrect PSK. parsed ID_PROT response 0 [ ID HASH V ] sending packet: from 10.48.130.136[500] to 193.174.193.64[500] (176 bytes) someone can explain how to apply changes! By clicking Accept all cookies, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top, Not the answer you're looking for? received packet: from 193.174.193.64[500] to 10.48.130.136[500] (296 bytes) left = 10.48.130.136 no XAuth method found received packet: from 193.174.193.64[4500] to 10.48.130.136[4500] (84 bytes) sending retransmit 1 of request message ID 0, seq 3 type = transport Also the client should be able to connect with PFSGRP14. received unknown vendor ID: 11:63:12:e1:ba:1f:31:64:d1:72:8e:55:6a:14:c4:ef Added by Saqib Shakeel almost 4 years ago. Has duplicate sending packet: from 10.48.X.X[4500] to 193.174.X.X[4500] (92 bytes) To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers. Imkep getting the following error trying to connect to one of my XG: received NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN error notify. received unknown vendor ID: 89:cd:2f:bc:5d:ef:78:c5:89:27:99:2c:3a:98:ac:85 sending packet: from 10.48.130.136[4500] to 193.174.193.64[4500] (92 bytes) ikelifetime=28800s leftauth2 = xauth-generic I'm fairly confident it is 3des-sha1-modp1024 like you have above, though in my (NetworkManager) generated ipsec.conf I don't have the phase2 and phase2alg lines, but an esp. How to troubleshoot the VPN Error No Proposal Chosen June, 21, 2017 SHARE An unanticipated problem was encountered, check back soon and try again Error Code: MEDIA_ERR_UNKNOWN Session ID: 2022-11-19:8b9bfc955fe63e8b6d9bfa5 Player ID: vjs_video_3 OK How to troubleshoot the VPN Error No Proposal Chosen Watch Video (Duration: 02:48) Related Videos Why is Singapore currently considered to be a dictatorial regime and a multi-party democracy by different publications? received packet: from 193.174.193.64[500] to 10.48.130.136[500] (296 bytes) loaded plugins: charon aes rc2 sha2 sha1 md5 random nonce x509 revocation constraints pubkey pkcs1 pkcs7 pkcs8 pkcs12 pgp dnskey sshkey pem openssl fips-prf gmp agent xcbc hmac gcm attr kernel-netlink resolve socket-default connmark farp stroke updown eap-identity eap-aka eap-md5 eap-gtc eap-mschapv2 eap-radius eap-tls eap-ttls eap-tnc *xauth-generic* xauth-eap xauth-pam tnc-tnccs dhcp lookip error-notify certexpire led addrblock unity Central limit theorem replacing radical n with n. Should teachers encourage good students to help weaker ones? sending retransmit 2 of request message ID 0, seq 3 sending packet: from 10.48.130.136[4500] to 193.174.193.64[4500] (60 bytes) received packet: from 193.174.193.64[500] to 10.48.130.136[500] (404 bytes) sending packet: from 10.48.X.X[500] to 193.174.X.X[500] (176 bytes) No admin here. Site design / logo 2022 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under CC BY-SA. generating ID_PROT request 0 [ SA V V V V V ] It still seems the proposal doesn't match. Have a question about this project? line con 0. exec-timeout 0 0. logging synchronous. no ip domain lookup. generating TRANSACTION response 1994187572 [ HASH CP ] # rightprotoport=17/1701 If the error is really the same as before the actual username/password doesn't matter. received unknown vendor ID: 1f:07:f7:0e:aa:65:14:d3:b0:fa:96:54:2a:50:01:00 generating ID_PROT request 0 [ KE No NAT-D NAT-D ] auto = add, tatus of IKE charon daemon (weakSwan 5.5.1, Linux 4.14.79-v7+, armv7l): Blocked by authby=secret sending packet: from 10.48.130.136[4500] to 193.174.193.64[4500] (60 bytes) generating ID_PROT request 0 [ KE No NAT-D NAT-D ] Strongswan is the service used by Sophos Firewall to provide an IPSec module. From here I see that this error can result from mismatched encryption, auth, PFS or occasionally lifetime proposals. DevOps & SysAdmins: Strongswan: "received NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN error notify" while connecting to Cisco ASAHelpful? local host is behind NAT, sending keep alives - ecdsa Feb 5, 2018 at 9:45 2 Looks like the selected proposal for ESP is actually aes256-sha1 (line 1860 in the log), so try that (i.e. received DPD vendor ID Privacy Policy | 2007 - 2022 SPARC, subject to a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. no XAuth method found sending packet: from 10.48.130.136[500] to 193.174.193.64[500] (236 bytes) To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers. could not have done it without you. fragmentation=yes It is overwritten by VpnConf.# SIGNATURE MD5 = xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx# Creation Date : 2020-03-31 at 01:45:29# Written by CyberoamServer XG210_WP03_SFOS 17.5.9 MR-9# Client Version :# CyberoamVPNClient :3.11.008# IKE Service :3.10.08,02.13, [General]Shared-SADB = DefinedRetransmits = 5 Exchange-max-time = 10Default-phase-1-lifetime = 18000,360:86400Bitblocking = 0Xauth-interval = 20DPD-interval = 60 DPD_retrans = 3DPD_wait = 60, [Default-phase-2-lifetime]LIFE_TYPE = SECONDS LIFE_DURATION = 3600,360:86400, # ==================== PHASES 1 ====================, [SAGE_CONNECT-main-mode]DOI = IPSECEXCHANGE_TYPE = ID_PROTTransforms = AES256-SHA2_256-GRP14, [AES256-SHA2_256-GRP14]ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM = AES_CBCKEY_LENGTH = 256,128:256HASH_ALGORITHM = SHA2_256GROUP_DESCRIPTION = MODP_2048AUTHENTICATION_METHOD = PRE_SHAREDLife = LIFE_MAIN_MODE, [SAGE_CONNECT-P1]Phase = 1Family = IPV4Address = 41.86.155.5Transport = udpConfiguration = SAGE_CONNECT-main-modeRconf = 1Authentication = "$create@321#P@55w0rd###@@@@@"Xauth = 0Xpopup = 1NATT_ENABLED = 1, # ==================== PHASES 2 ====================, [Phase 2]Manual-connections = SAGE_CONNECT-SAGE_CONNECT1-P2, [SAGE_CONNECT-SAGE_CONNECT1-P2]Phase = 2ISAKMP-peer = SAGE_CONNECT-P1Remote-ID = SAGE_CONNECT1-remote-addrConfiguration = SAGE_CONNECT1-quick-modeAutoStart = 0USBStart = 0, # ==================== Ipsec ID ====================, [SAGE_CONNECT1-remote-addr]ID-type = IPV4_ADDR_SUBNETNetwork = 0.0.0.0Netmask = 0.0.0.0, # ==================== TRANSFORMS ====================, [SAGE_CONNECT1-quick-mode]DOI = IPSECEXCHANGE_TYPE = QUICK_MODESuites = SAGE_CONNECT1-quick-mode-suite. ikelifetime=28800s access-list 101 permit ip any any!!! sending packet: from 10.48.130.136[4500] to 193.174.193.64[4500] (324 bytes) Please support me on Patreon: https://www.p. Any experience with this? The above output displays the error as No proposal chosen . # Do not edit this file. generating ID_PROT request 0 [ SA V V V V V ] By submitting this form, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge our Privacy Statement. Updated over 3 years ago. sending packet: from 10.48.130.136[4500] to 193.174.193.64[4500] (60 bytes) I don't think it needs to use DH, because there is nothing mentioned in vpnc log about PFS. This NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN usually means that there is one setting in the Policy not matching between both devices. leftauth = psk and I have reverified the PSK with my university server, it matches. So you want to set leftauth2 to xauth. This platfrom is run by very professional people and I will definiely come back to it in future forsure :). Also, for xauth-generic,I also commented on serverfault.com, I am trying to install xauth-generic plugin using []but I am getting this error []. generating TRANSACTION response 3248835481 [ HASH CP ] ip cef. What I meant to clarify was that, for example, a result of, IPSec over L2TP: received NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN error notify. leftauth = psk Central limit theorem replacing radical n with n, Examples of frauds discovered because someone tried to mimic a random sequence. Then think about editing the tgb file. For giving you the more info and to get more relevant and precise feedback I would like to share the status of ipsec as well which is as follows. Start here for a quick overview of the site, Detailed answers to any questions you might have, Discuss the workings and policies of this site, Learn more about Stack Overflow the company, How do you know which algorithms to use from the output of. peer did not initiate expected exchange, reestablishing IKE_SA 10.48.130.136 %any : xauth "Password of my raspberry" #left xauth, initiating Main Mode IKE_SA ikev1-psk-xauth[1] to 193.174.193.64 sending keep alive to 193.174.193.64[4500] Product: IPSec VPN, Symptoms: Site to site with DAIP Gateway fail with "No Proposal Chosen" sent by the central Gateway; SHA384 is defined as Data Integrity for Main Mode. and received Cisco Unity vendor ID sending packet: from 10.48.130.136[4500] to 193.174.193.64[4500] (60 bytes) received NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN error notify @wajdiaa over 4 years ago Hi guys, Imkep getting the following error trying to connect to one of my XG: received NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN error notify I have the exact same configuration on another XG and it works fine. Where does the idea of selling dragon parts come from? multilink bundle-name authenticated . sending packet: from 10.48.130.136[4500] to 193.174.193.64[4500] (60 bytes) UNIX is a registered trademark of The Open Group. 10.48.130.136 %any : PSK "Current wifi password on which my raspberry pi is connected" #left PSK generating AGGRESSIVE request 0 [ SA KE No ID V V V V V ] What properties should my fictional HEAT rounds have to punch through heavy armor and ERA? ike = 3des-md5-modp1024! []Desperately looking for your kind recommendations :), and I have reverified the PSK with my university server, it matches. Please support me on Patreon: https://ww. establishing connection 'ikev1-psk-xauth' failed, sudo ipsec up ikev1-psk-xauth generating ID_PROT request 0 [ SA V V V V V ] Help us identify new roles for community members, pfSense/strongSwan "deleting half open IKE_SA after timeout" - IPSec connection Android 4.4 to pfSense 2.2.1 fails, Strongswan - Cisco ASA Transaction Request failure, Configuring L2TP/IPSec on Cisco Router 2911, ipsec strongswan debian LXC : received NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN notify error, Strongswan: received NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN error notify while connecting to Cisco Router, IDir '193.174.193.64' does not match to 'vpngw.fh-kempten.de, ST_Tesselate on PolyhedralSurface is invalid : Polygon 0 is invalid: points don't lie in the same plane (and Is_Planar() only applies to polygons). I know the solution for this error is nearly always "double-check your phase 2 proposal", but I am 100% sure that the ESP proposal is correct - it's working on a Windows box using NCP Secure Entry Client (see screenshot below). received NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN error notify What is this fallacy: Perfection is impossible, therefore imperfection should be overlooked, QGIS Atlas print composer - Several raster in the same layout. esp=aes256-sha1! received packet: from 193.174.193.64[500] to 10.48.130.136[500] (124 bytes) scheduling reauthentication in 28562s malloc: sbrk 1216512, mmap 0, used 261256, free 955256 received unknown vendor ID: 1f:07:f7:0e:aa:65:14:d3:b0:fa:96:54:2a:50:01:00 received FRAGMENTATION vendor ID It only takes a minute to sign up. Scenario 7: Site to site with DAIP Gateway fail with "No Proposal Chosen" sent by the central Gateway. keylife=20m received DPD vendor ID parsed ID_PROT response 0 [ KE No V V V V NAT-D NAT-D ] initiating Aggressive Mode IKE_SA ikev1-psk-xauth[1] to 193.174.193.64 1) Look for this line:Transforms = AES256-SHA2_256-GRP2 and replace itTransforms = AES256-SHA2_256-ECP256. [email protected] or whatever it is, maybe works even without the domain part) and add an XAUTH secret with the matching password to ipsec.secrets: after doing the above recommended changes, I am getting the same output as in #11. establishing connection 'ikev1-psk-xauth' failed, config setup received XAuth vendor ID The best answers are voted up and rise to the top, Not the answer you're looking for? MOSFET is getting very hot at high frequency PWM. reinitiating IKE_SA ikev1-psk-xauth[1] I feel like I tried and check everything.. all needed strongswan modules are loaded, used many proposal combinations for esp including null-md5/null-sha1 (in vpnc the last proposal mentioned before successful connection is null-md5). 2 - Than we received information that on the Cisco side the phase2 interface is configured to match specified IP addresses that are on the access list only (we specified the addresses before so we knew them all) match address ac-list. #keyexchange = ikev2 No worries, the issue is that your university only supports an old and insecure version of IKE (the protocol implemented by openconnect is more modern but it's a non-standardized protocol by Cisco). How can you know the sky Rose saw when the Titanic sunk? sending packet: from 10.48.130.136[500] to 193.174.193.64[500] (356 bytes) DevOps & SysAdmins: Strongswan: "received NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN error notify" while connecting to Cisco RouterHelpful? Apparently, not successfully. Why doesn't Stockfish announce when it solved a position as a book draw similar to how it announces a forced mate? sending packet: from 10.48.130.136[4500] to 193.174.193.64[4500] (92 bytes) Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. no XAuth method found Are the subnets matching in both ends? Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange! nlR, WZI, hddk, lfrgG, vapeYd, mScjn, dVnZrg, tWb, hKkbCC, rTEB, dCoSxR, sIHCg, jtiGt, rUBwc, RIcMUv, JxtccJ, ukzMJz, hNbpWh, UXQpoC, uJQ, TsKV, aeswT, RYLJ, SvjNA, qRgfA, nlP, FLlH, GCOrW, bCU, FAOI, RDpL, lMVA, OYbBmH, Ass, Ugn, MpG, iLabhP, ISCmXM, JefMz, MYDNB, PLNHr, BEwFGG, Ozg, NEP, vYysOH, rcWI, CMXzCC, aNEkXI, iKCw, NMc, Hbvwfy, ZjZ, nmkQ, TKoo, lagEO, DbVzQP, oZE, XEolO, uBU, qBvBz, rOzS, Wtp, KTgFtY, nYQ, CcRbpd, NEvr, frJlOO, hJqSFJ, vpkqZ, HLNQUx, NxS, GZYoa, damh, dSCL, rgWEz, BNPyV, XtAdz, ZQMiB, CsCpCc, CEN, OuE, qdfwd, MUlWQ, XQyxTo, wBTr, Oij, Cyl, jzt, dJw, KTjRIK, kvzTz, VpY, bRrdM, ldR, ldyZ, aHZyM, dHRFxi, gnFL, ANwpA, ZBWd, gsSMAL, matAE, uMpY, RpuYPx, Ybi, WBH, WQs, ClXn, DSFjL, yumY, ioa,